*
RVG alliance
« on: April 05, 2008, 11:33:40 pm »
Hey everyone it's time the ReVenGers takes a major leap..by having an alliance with CRYSIS avengers..

What do you'll think CA... We await you response..

Even if we go through in having an alliance we will continue to have wars against each other.. :D
But we will support one and other in the time of need...
Thanks  (Y)

Let us know of what youll think..  ;D

*

    Offline Freak-Wizard

  • Crysis Avenger
  • *****
  • 1439
  • 4
  • Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse
    • View Profile
Re: RVG alliance
« Reply #1 on: April 05, 2008, 11:37:38 pm »
Please state what you mean by "Alliance" and also "help at time of need" and state the conditions of the alliance.  :)
*
Re: RVG alliance
« Reply #2 on: April 06, 2008, 08:12:22 am »
Please state what you mean by "Alliance" and also "help at time of need" and state the conditions of the alliance.  :)

yes please. and we will not give the response as soon as you think cuz we have to discuss it with the other members.

Even if we go through in having an alliance we will continue to have wars against each other.. :D

??? does an alliance have a civil war within themselves?
*
Re: RVG alliance
« Reply #3 on: April 06, 2008, 09:17:53 am »
Alright here are the conditions..

1) If RVG is out of players CA must provide players if there is an emergency war... (works the other way around also).

2) We will be freindly and help each other out..

3) We can have wars against each other..

Thats it..Let me know of what youll think

*

    Offline Rav

  • KTHX!
  • *****
  • 6369
  • 125
  • Gamer.LK
    • View Profile
Re: RVG alliance
« Reply #4 on: April 06, 2008, 10:09:56 am »
I don't think there should be any players crossing over. If RVG has to take party in a clan match and RVG members aren't available, another clan can't fill in for them. It wouldn't be RVG then, and any title you'll get from that clan match will NOT go to RVG as a clan.

Just something to think about :)
*
Re: RVG alliance
« Reply #5 on: April 06, 2008, 10:29:56 am »
good point..but didnt CA play with non clan members in the clan war.. :)

*
Re: RVG alliance
« Reply #6 on: April 06, 2008, 10:41:51 am »
gamer has a point there.. Shocker and bio wasnt CA..
Sinister
*
Re: RVG alliance
« Reply #7 on: April 06, 2008, 11:11:18 am »
dey were. we did a last minute remake of the clan. and i do not agree with the conditions above. It would be a total mess up.

for your info teh members of CA are now:

LION
B13
Shocker
Dsrt_eagle
Emorphus47
Spoon aka Freak_Wizard

thank u..
« Last Edit: April 06, 2008, 11:13:00 am by dsrt_eagle »
*
Re: RVG alliance
« Reply #8 on: April 06, 2008, 11:18:21 am »
yes i know about the remake la, but when we played the clan game, they weren't recruited in CA, after the clan game only they taken by u..
Sinister
*
Re: RVG alliance
« Reply #9 on: April 06, 2008, 11:19:40 am »
we were out of players. we had to do sumtin la! XD
*
Re: RVG alliance
« Reply #10 on: April 06, 2008, 11:25:06 am »
thats the whole point, that was what gamer was talking about :D
Sinister
*
Re: RVG alliance
« Reply #11 on: April 06, 2008, 11:43:38 am »
i think it would be great havin alliance with CA :)


Brother of ReVenGers.
*
Re: RVG alliance
« Reply #12 on: April 06, 2008, 11:45:26 am »
big shout goes to B13 and Shocker! u guys are recruited to CA :D

To be honest, this brought us a bit of a disappointment after the CA vs RVG clan match and on having an alliance with another clan... I'm sticking with Rav's opinion. :)
*

    Offline Freak-Wizard

  • Crysis Avenger
  • *****
  • 1439
  • 4
  • Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse
    • View Profile
Re: RVG alliance
« Reply #13 on: April 06, 2008, 12:09:52 pm »
RAV is utterly right. And im sorry I do not agree with gamer's 1) point. A clan is about having their own members and if we provide members to you'll when you'll need members then whats gonna happen at the matches between us and you'll? We can't provide people when we go up against you'll. Think about it again.  :)
*
Re: RVG alliance
« Reply #14 on: April 06, 2008, 01:01:23 pm »
You'll are taking it wrong. He means, if RVG is havin a clan war againts a non-GLK clan, and we are short of players, then comes the point. Ofcourse we all wanna make GLK popular. In that case CA will provide players.

Example - RVG vs. MEN IN BLOOD (found from the net. An austalian clan)
               5 vs. 5
               Imagine RVG is short of plyers, So CA can provide players to RVG

Thats wat gamer is trying to explain
« Last Edit: April 06, 2008, 01:03:37 pm by Mafia Killer »