web analytics

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ~SS~

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
1
Voting / Re: The signature contest v1.0 [voting]
« on: November 25, 2009, 09:57:28 am »
It's up to you on how you judge sigs; but judging them based on the amount of images and effects used, and then using that as a qualitative measure does not mean that it is more visually appealing.

Why don't you ask someone who uses my sig, about the process we go through for them to settle on one? Ask them the amount of reworking, adjust, redoing, that I do to ensure that they are left with a sig they like. Sometimes I've been asked to redo about two weeks of work just because they don't like something.

Hand-drawn designs like the Death Company crest took a month or so to do. It doesn't have any fancy fonts, colours or effects. And I think it looks a lot better than some other logo designs people have done and posted here.

Yeh i agree your text and the boarder ect. looks way better than others who have posted, and yeh reworking and all takes ages too, but the point is showing all that effort to other people, like me when i saw your sig first it look'd like a 2 min job.

2
Voting / Re: The signature contest v1.0 [voting]
« on: November 25, 2009, 09:34:39 am »
Your point that I failed to understand was poorly stated. You implied that I don't do any work, I just "google" sigs. Saying that I "google" sigs and implying that no thinking is done on them is an insult to my work.

A sig doesn't have to have more than one image to look good, it depends on the end result. If you had seen some the sigs that I made before the current batch, then you probably would've told me the opposite. In some sigs I have used more than one image, in some, I've used just one. In some I haven't used a background at all. Sometimes I use hand drawn designs like the DC crest, and sometimes I used existing templates and stock images.

The only uniqueness between your sig and mine, is the fact that you have more stock images in the background and it is animated. I didn't know judging the looks of a sig meant counting the images used to make it.

I could use a watermark too. I could use a lot more images too. But what matters at the end of the day is, "does it look nice?".

Good for you that you know Photoshop and how it works. I use COREL.

Your sigs arent bad, but seven's are better thats all lol, you can see hes spent more time and effort on his sigs more than yours, making a sig unique it what makes it better than the rest, and someone who knws about graphics can easily identify the difference.

Did you hand draw these? Didn't you just pick up some pictures and put them together? :P You think you are so much better cause you think you can blend two images together? Please, stop being so arrogant.

Also adding a gif effect wouldn't take more than 10 mins...(in ur case) however the first sig of Seven with the lightening effect is really good. I guess you just copied him.

lolwot? making an opinion is not called being arrogant, thats whts forums are for lol.
and those sigs i made are like 6 months old lol.

3
Voting / Re: The signature contest v1.0 [voting]
« on: November 25, 2009, 08:44:46 am »
Find my sig on Google. :)

You failed to understand wht i said lol, saying it in simple words seven's sig's as i can see there's atleast 2 pics used to make each, unlike yours its just a pic you can easily find from google then adjust its lighting and put into the sig format. I knw how photoshop works lol i make my own sigs too, and make sigs for many clans.
here's example of couple i did, ul see wht a unique sig means, its not a pic from google lol, its more than tht.




4
Voting / Re: The signature contest v1.0 [voting]
« on: November 25, 2009, 03:48:33 am »
i vote for seven, hes sigs are unique and quality, not just a picture from google put into a sig format and change contrast like daelin's

5
First Person Shooters / Re: Modern Warfare 2
« on: November 14, 2009, 09:35:29 am »
singleplayer was great, like watching a movie. finishd in 6 hours.

6
MAX / Re: DirkBlack "the RIOT" frag MOVIE
« on: November 14, 2009, 09:34:20 am »
watchd half.
shit music, no streaks jst some clips edited with flash effects? lol k.

7
General / Re: game survey
« on: November 02, 2009, 05:16:01 pm »
I would answer and help you out but i dont live in SL sorry.

Sorry for being so intrusive, but what is this project you're working on? School? University? If so, what is the title of the project?

Just want to know what exactly I'm filling out a survey for xD

sigh...

8
Game Lounge / Re: Hot Strippers or Counter Strike? CS wins! [NSFW]
« on: November 02, 2009, 05:14:47 am »
there was a lan here in nz which was at a strip club, was awes.

9
Funnies / Re: The ROFL of the day
« on: October 24, 2009, 02:18:29 pm »








[youtube=425,350]TTUrDkBUtfk[/youtube]

10
General / Re: GMRZ.SL Bunch OF MONKEY ADMINS
« on: October 24, 2009, 10:56:14 am »
corruption. its a common thing in sl.

11
First Person Shooters / Re: Operation Flashpoint 2
« on: October 12, 2009, 09:30:45 am »
the game looks bit slow :(

its actually very slow, if you have played ArmedAssault its similar, you gotta spend about ~5min or + looking for enemy areas then getting your team together.
Theyv tried to make it very realistic, you cant compare this game with cod or cs.

12
First Person Shooters / Re: Modern Warfare 2
« on: October 07, 2009, 06:14:27 am »
PC version has been delayed for 2 week from the original release date
So sad to hear that

for UK only.

13
Funnies / Re: Heehe Guys Gotta watch diz funny man
« on: September 29, 2009, 11:10:06 am »
lol @ the video response for that vid.

[youtube=425,350]NHUJLWQ3Ge0[/youtube]

14
Game Lounge / Re: Mega Screen Mobile Gaming.
« on: September 21, 2009, 04:23:04 pm »
Go to http://www.playmegaphone.com/ and check their videos. You'll have better idea whether this is stupid or not. Mind you, to my knowledge Sri Lanka has the second ever development team to successfully complete this gaming platform from scratch. Appreciate that without talking like an idiot knowing nothing.

EDIT: BTW read the post carefully. Mobile here doesn't just stand for the mobile phone. The game server as well is mobile.

Note : The Sri Lankan development team has no affiliation what so ever with MegaPhone US.

Nice graphics man, hope you enjoy it alot.

watched that vid, think its still kinda stupid.

15
Game Lounge / Re: Mega Screen Mobile Gaming.
« on: September 21, 2009, 01:37:36 pm »
mobile gaming? sounds pretty stupid idea to me.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4